An AI search content audit evaluates how well your existing content is positioned to earn citations from AI assistants. This guide provides a systematic framework for assessing and improving your GEO readiness.
Why audit for AI search?
Traditional content audits focus on SEO metrics like rankings, traffic, and backlinks. An AI search audit evaluates different factors:
| Traditional SEO audit | AI search audit |
|---|---|
| Keyword rankings | Citation frequency |
| Organic traffic | AI referral traffic |
| Backlink profile | Answer extractability |
| Page speed | Content structure |
| Meta optimization | Direct answer quality |
An AI-focused audit reveals opportunities that traditional audits miss.
The audit framework
Phase 1: Inventory
Create a complete inventory of your content:
Content types to include:
- Blog posts and articles
- Product/service pages
- Documentation
- Glossary/definition pages
- Comparison pages
- FAQ pages
- Resource pages
Data to collect:
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
| URL | Identification |
| Title | Query matching |
| Word count | Depth indicator |
| Publish date | Freshness |
| Last updated | Currency |
| Primary topic | Categorization |
| Content type | Template matching |
| Current rankings | SEO baseline |
Phase 2: Citation testing
Test how AI assistants currently handle your topics:
Testing process:
- List 20-50 queries related to your content
- Test each query in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google
- Document which sources get cited
- Note if your content appears
- Analyze competitors who get cited
Citation testing template:
| Query | Platform | Your content cited? | Competitors cited | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| "What is [topic]?" | ChatGPT | No | CompetitorA.com | Missing definition |
| "How to [action]" | Perplexity | Yes | - | Cited step 3 |
| "[A] vs [B]" | Google AI | No | CompetitorB.com | No comparison page |
Phase 3: Structure assessment
Evaluate each page's structural readiness:
Structure scoring rubric:
| Element | Points | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Direct answer opening | 0-3 | Clear answer in first 2-3 sentences |
| Heading structure | 0-3 | Logical H1→H2→H3 hierarchy |
| Comparison table | 0-2 | Structured data where relevant |
| FAQ section | 0-2 | 4+ relevant questions answered |
| Definition clarity | 0-2 | Key terms defined clearly |
| Internal links | 0-2 | 2-4 contextual links |
Score interpretation:
- 12-14: AI-ready
- 8-11: Needs optimization
- 0-7: Major restructuring needed
Phase 4: Content quality assessment
Evaluate content depth and accuracy:
Quality checklist:
- Content directly answers the target query
- Information is accurate and current
- Sufficient depth (400+ words for substantial topics)
- Includes specific data, examples, or details
- No outdated information or broken links
- Covers related questions users might have
Phase 5: Technical assessment
Check technical factors affecting AI crawlability:
| Factor | Check | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| robots.txt | AI crawlers not blocked | Critical |
| Page speed | Loads in < 3 seconds | High |
| Mobile-friendly | Responsive design | Medium |
| Canonical tags | Self-referencing | Medium |
| Schema markup | Relevant structured data | Medium |
| SSL certificate | HTTPS enabled | Low |
Prioritization matrix
After auditing, prioritize improvements using this matrix:
High priority (fix first)
| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
| High-traffic page, low structure score | Restructure for AI extraction |
| Competitor cited, you're not | Create or improve content |
| Definition page without clear definition | Add direct answer opening |
| Missing comparison for common query | Create comparison page |
Medium priority
| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
| Good content, missing FAQ section | Add FAQ section |
| Decent structure, no internal links | Add contextual links |
| Outdated information | Update and refresh |
| Good page, weak opening | Rewrite first paragraph |
Lower priority
| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
| Low-traffic page, low score | Consider consolidating or removing |
| Niche topic, already cited | Minor improvements only |
| Page with good structure already | Maintain and monitor |
Content gap analysis
Identify missing content that could earn citations:
Query coverage gaps
| Gap type | How to identify | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Definition gaps | AI cites competitors for "what is X" | Create glossary page |
| Comparison gaps | No content for "X vs Y" queries | Create comparison page |
| How-to gaps | AI can't find your tutorials | Create step-by-step guide |
| FAQ gaps | Common questions unanswered | Add FAQ sections |
Topic authority gaps
- Map your topic clusters
- Identify pillar topics without comprehensive coverage
- Find supporting topics with no content
- Note competitor topics you don't cover
Audit scoring example
Sample page audit
Page: /blog/content-marketing-strategy
| Criterion | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Direct answer opening | 1/3 | Intro is too vague |
| Heading structure | 2/3 | Good H2s, missing H3s |
| Comparison table | 0/2 | No tables |
| FAQ section | 0/2 | No FAQ |
| Definition clarity | 1/2 | Terms used but not defined |
| Internal links | 2/2 | Good contextual linking |
| Total | 6/14 | Major restructuring needed |
Recommended improvements:
- Rewrite opening with direct answer
- Add comparison table for strategies
- Include FAQ section with 4+ questions
- Define key terms in dedicated section
Audit tracking template
Track your audit progress and improvements:
Master audit spreadsheet
| URL | Structure score | Citation status | Priority | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /glossary/geo | 12/14 | Cited | Low | Done | Maintain |
| /blog/seo-tips | 5/14 | Not cited | High | In progress | Adding FAQ |
| /compare/a-vs-b | 8/14 | Competitor cited | High | Pending | Restructure |
Progress metrics
Track these metrics monthly:
- Pages audited
- Average structure score
- Pages optimized
- New citations earned
- Citation share vs competitors
Common audit findings
Most frequent issues
| Issue | Frequency | Impact | Fix difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vague opening paragraphs | Very common | High | Easy |
| Missing FAQ sections | Very common | High | Easy |
| Poor heading structure | Common | High | Medium |
| No comparison tables | Common | Medium | Easy |
| Outdated information | Common | High | Medium |
| Blocked AI crawlers | Rare | Critical | Easy |
Quick wins
These improvements typically show results fastest:
- Add direct answer to first paragraph
- Insert FAQ section with 4-6 questions
- Add comparison table where relevant
- Update outdated statistics or pricing
- Fix any crawler blocking issues
FAQs
How often should I audit for AI search?
Quarterly for comprehensive audits. Monthly spot checks for priority pages. Immediately when competitors start getting cited for your topics.
How many pages should I audit at once?
Start with your top 20-30 pages by traffic. Then expand to cover all content types. Full audits of large sites can be phased over multiple weeks.
Should I audit competitors too?
Yes. Understanding what gets competitors cited helps you identify winning patterns. Focus on 3-5 direct competitors.
What if my content scores well but isn't cited?
Check technical factors (crawlability, speed). Verify the content targets queries AI actually gets. Consider whether the topic has enough AI search volume.
Next steps
- Use the AI search optimization checklist to fix issues
- Learn about AI search content structure
- Review how AI citations work